One of the good number of scientists and politicians who openly
admitted global warming was a tool being used to unite mankind against
themselves in order to impose drastic measures to restrict power,
movement and wealth, was Stephen Schneider. He was the one with Margaret
Mead's Endangered Atmosphere conference (when they said we were heading
for an ice age) they needed to create scary scenarios to make the
people ask for a change, which they had already wanted to create but
needed the reason. Imagine my surprise when looking for that quote, to
see one of the three leading figures in original global warming history
(along with Mann and Hansen) provide this 2002 quote:
In a January 2002 Scientific American article Schneider wrote:
"I readily confess a lingering frustration: uncertainties so infuse
the issue of climate change that it is still impossible to rule out
either mild or catastrophic outcomes, let alone provide confident
probabilities for all the claims and counterclaims made about
environmental problems. Even the most credible international assessment
body, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), has refused
to attempt subjective probabilistic estimates of future temperatures.
This has forced politicians to make their own guesses about the
likelihood of various degrees of global warming"
Almost totally
contradicting his previous public media statements (he was one of the
most catastrophic prophets of doom on the planet, now replaced by his
second in line David Suzuki, who describes humans as maggots eating
their own waste), he slipped in (as is inevitable if you wait long
enough) a quote of the truth, and is worth a million lies from the same
person, whose entire recent career was admitted to be based on them.
"So we have to offer up scary scenarios, make simplified, dramatic
statements, and make little mention of any doubts we might have. This
'double ethical bind' we frequently find ourselves in cannot be solved
by any formula. Each of us has to decide what the right balance is
between being effective and being honest."
Too late Stevie, you did mention the doubts you said they musn't, as you had them, and as only they were real and not your pretence they didn't exist, despite your greatest efforts, they came out, and in writing.
He admitted, along
with Margaret Mead, Henry Kissinger and Mike Hulme, that the cause was
greater than the truth. That is the entire foundation of global warming,
adjustments, man made models, predictions and the rewriting of
thousands of years of climate records, proven by the originals used in
textbooks for decades. It is easy to fake science as only scientists can
prove it has been faked, who tend to protect their fellow peers by the
usual balance of threats and emoluments. But wait long enough and even
the lowest of the low scum slip out what they really mean, whether in
private via Climategate, or less frequently in an open interview.
Make no mistake, this was one of the three most influential scientists
on earth promoting the cause of saving the planet from global warming.
Long before the internet he worked on a public profile knowing his
earlier quotes would be almost impossible to turn up, and by the time
they did they carried so little weight against the decades of spin, it
didn't really matter. But the truth catches up with everyone sooner or
later, and contradicting himself just once is worth every single lie he
told in his lifetime (he admitted it, this is not my opinion), and he
admitted himself in a single sentence of confession HE DIDN'T REALLY
KNOW AS THE SCIENCE WASN'T SOLID ENOUGH TO RELY ON.
QED
Sources
No comments:
Post a Comment