Tuesday, 10 March 2026

If only the truth could exist

 Imagine a world where only the truth could exist. Many people would challenge some of these points. I believe some are common sense and science, and others need a level of perception to work out. Rather than serve my material cold I will do my best to explain them in turn.

 

No one would say mankind can affect the climate. We have had catastrophic predictions about the climate since the 80s. Besides the CO2 rising and a little warming nothing else has caused any increase in extreme weather or losses from the climate whatever the alleged cause of the warming.

Transgender would be a mental delusion the medical profession worked to cure with compassion. Delusions do not have exceptions. Until the political attack on science transgender, following the requirement to be outside consensus reality (as well as being connected to numerous other mental illnesses), was excluded from the definition of mental illness against science and logic. It does people no favours to affirm their beliefs and then try and force society to agree with them. If they would not do this for anorexics or paranoid schizophrenics why pick a single example and normalise it?

 

All racial differences would be accepted as part of our differences, not as a way to condemn anyone. Overlapping with other similar points, all individual lives are of equal value, but claiming all people are inherently a blank slate is a utopian ideology which denies genetic evidence. Races exist and have their own traits, it is the assignation of values and hierarchy to them which is wrong, not the differences themselves. Social scientists attributing their differences in attainment, specific abilities and outcomes as caused by society and discrimination simply causes resentment and deters people from making an effort.

 

Taxation does not make poor people richer but does make anyone above average poorer. Taxation by definition removes money which belongs to someone. Depending where it comes from it either raises prices or reduces wealth. This means the money which could be spent personally and used to grow the economy is siphoned off to the state, maintaining a total stasis in GDP and removing an amount which would be likely to have been spent privately. This in turn would grow GDP and increase the total tax take rather than increasing tax up front and losing the total as the amount it is taken from is lower. I am not saying taxation is unneccesary but only the bare minimum unless a better alternative is found.

 

Hurty words are the problem of the speaker not the receiver. No one can be affected by them as a victim if they know this. Words are powerless if not followed by action. Lying is not hurty words and is a sin, but calling people names is most prevalent in primary school, and if you can’t take it after that it is something you need to work on. Using insults is part of life and human nature. All rude comments and jokes made without malice should not be banned or criticised. It is how people entertain each other.

 

In a free society everyone talented can succeed regardless of their identity. 

In all free countries there are laws protecting certain races from persecution and no laws stopping progress in business and education. Blaming failure on someone’s identity is giving up and handing over your entire power to others. Every black or Asian person who runs businesses or has a top professional role are proof talent alone is all that is required combined with persistence. Anything else is just an excuse.

 

We are born with our maximum IQ which can never be increased by environment. Twin and similar experiments confirm this. Mensa set this rule and modern genetics are confirming our traits are primarily genetic, IQ is like your height and nothing in the way of training or experience can increase it.

 

Every person's life is equal, but every individual is unique. Political tropes around preferential treatment or lower races are all empty. Every single life (I personally include animals but that is my personal preference) is equal, so you can’t deny a single person rights or raise them (much like the royal family) to a higher level based on their identity. But that is not connected with everyone being the same as even identical twins from the same egg sharing the same DNA have their own personalities. It is naive to expect everyone to be capable of doing what others can do just because they are also human. We are born with a set of talents and weaknesses and should focus on them and not try and force ourselves or be forced by others to do things we are not designed to do. All people are better at certain jobs and sport by nature and should not be forced to do others when other people are naturally better at it than they are. 

 

The next point is one I wished I didn’t have to make but some people do not believe it despite us all sharing similar nervous systems, which is that all animals feel everything exactly the same we do so must be treated with the same respect and consideration.

Preferring to be with people like yourself is not racist, it is human and all other animal's nature. Everyone feels more comfortable in their own family and community. Some people have happily taken up lives in new ones but by nature we all return to our own cultures wherever we are, as illustrated by pockets of immigrants around the world who mix with their own people as it feels normal to them. Labelling nature racist may be accurate but it is not actually a fault.

Everything you gain by cheating still belongs to its owner and carries a dark energy you will always feel uncomfortable with subconsciously. I believe this is self evident but ignored by those who do it.

 

Every opinion based on preference rather than ignorance is equally valid. People mixing up opinions and facts are extremely dangerous and have begun to restrict freedom in society by excluding or outlawing people who either state facts they do not like (such as people can’t change sex) or because they hold the wrong opinions (such as multiculturalism and mass immigration are good things. Science, as I have already said, divides male and female, and multiculturalism and mass immigration may be enjoyed by some people but our nature appears to prefer not. Otherwise you could reach a point where certain food or colours were outlawed, yes it sounds crazy but people have been prosecuted for calling a man a man already so nothing appears to be off limits for the future.

 

Inflation is state sanctioned theft. Inflation is an indirect form of taxation. Money is never lost (unless cash is physically destroyed), it just moves ownership. Normally people would all agree their £1000 in the bank would suffer if it became £980 every year, which is correct. But if the government don’t take it, but like charging the same for a smaller and smaller chocolate bar, you keep the £1000 but it buys 2% less under the government’s own 2% inflation target. You are being scammed.

 

There have always been enough resources so everyone can live well. The shortage myth creates an artificial market restricting it to the wealthiest only.  The statistics confirm there is always enough food and resources for everyone but they are kept from them by businesses and governments to create an artificial shortage so those in control of them can maximise profits.

 

Every corporate and political fraud would be exposed and unable to ever happen again. If one then all of these issues were common knowledge and culture many if not most of society’s problems would be removed. Most societal norms are based in tradition and illusion and most people who accept them are unable to imagine anything else is possible as that is all they know, and they will fight to the end to defend their cultural values independent of any valid evidence against them.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tuesday, 11 November 2025

The genuine data on the climate

 Both scientists, media and politicians rarely if ever present any of the data on the climate we can all find in a few minutes. I am not offering any reason for this, only doing what they appear unwilling or unable to do.

The claims made about our current and future climate appear frightening, but so far I have yet to find a single area which has been made worse by the slight warming we have experienced since the end of the little ice age in the 19th century.

Firstly here are the extreme weather events. There is no trend in any of them. If I find any newer ones I will continue to add them. I have added as many examples of each issue for corroboration and so as not to be accused of cherry picking.

Some people will say but extreme weather is increasing. This is explained here, as being down to a number of reasons based on poor data collection and reporting. Nonetheless the graphs below, confirmed by many statements directly from the IPCC means the official figures suggest no trends.

It also relies heavily on predictions, often to 2100 despite no one being alive at the time to see it when they were originally made. Here's my favourite and represents them all for me in a single claim.

Were consensus a valid scientific principle (rather than actually replacing actual good data) you may imagine it was against man's role in the climate reading the statements from the climate experts:

So take climate advice from a geologist, a Physicist, and an engineer.
You know who we should listen to?
Real climatologists who would disagree
1. Dr John Christy- Most IPCC scientists don't agree that global warming is occurring, findings are misrepresented/politicized.
2. Dr Rosa Compagnucci - Humans contributed only a few tenths of a degree; solar activity is the key driver
3. Dr Robert Davis - Temperatures not changing as models predicted; satellite data ignored in summaries.
4. Dr Willem de Lange - Listed in IPCO without full agreement on human influence.
5. Dr Richard Lindzen - IPCC process politics-driven: summaries
misrepresent scientists.
exploit
ignorance.
6. Dr Harrv Lins - No net warming for over a decade; alarm grossly overstated
7. Steven McIntyre- "Consensus of thousands" is exaggerated/misleading
8. Dr Patrick Michaels - Warming rates invalidate IPCC models
9. Dr Vincent Gray - IPCC statement at "orchestrated litany of lies."
10. Dr Tom Segalstad - IPCC global warming model not supported by data.
11. Dr Robert Balling - No acceleration in sea level rise (omitted from summaries)
12. Dr Lucka Bogataj - CO2 rise follows temperature changes (lag of ~700 years).
13. Dr Philip Lloyd - Summaries distort/contradict scientists' findings
14. Dr Martin Manning - Government
Delegates misrepresent/contradict the lead authors.
15. Dr Paul Reiter - "Settled science" is an obscenity; science distorted.
16. Dr. Murray Salby - Gag reflex to "settle science' claims.
17. Dr Indur Goklany - Climate change unlikely to be the most important environmental problem; no signal in extreme weather mortality.
18. Dr Judith Curry - No confidence in PCC process to just endorse it
19. Dr Robert Carter - (Various on natural variability dominating)
20-46. The remaining entries include additional quotes from figures like Dr Vils-Axel Mörner (sea level claims exaggerated), Dr Madhav Khandekar greater natural/solar role), Dr Lee Gerhard (IPCC claims false, paucity of data), and others focusing on mode flaws, politicization, and ocean acidification overstated. no acceleration in extremes summaries opposite to science, and emphasis on natural cycles (e.g., solar, "DO/AMO). Many repeat themes include distorted summaries, ignored data (e.g., satellite data), or an overemphasis on CO2 versus natural factors.



Update. I have discovered why some graphs show some extreme weather increasing while others don't. 



https://www.thegwpf.org/content/uploads/2023/02/IPCC-Extreme-Weather.pdf

 







Floods.




Flood history in Spain.





Droughts.





It has increased in recent years.

However when taking a wider context droughts can be seen as responding to more factors than temperature.




Rainfall.


 
Top graph is the change in the global annual average daily rainfall compared to a 30 year ‘normal’ value from 1961-1990 (i.e. Rainfall Anomaly) . The bottom graph compares this global average rainfall anomaly to the global average temperature anomaly

Fires.




Hurricanes.



Tornadoes.

Hot days.

 Source EPA






Snow.





Ice.






Polar bears.



Coral.








Food production.



Sea level.

The sea level has risen under a foot a century since the end of the little ice age, and after a slight acceleration may now reach a foot in the 21st century, caused mainly by melting land ice in the Antarctic, Greenland and glaciers, plus thermal expansion. The quarter of the Antarctic which has consistently melted is above a volcanic area.

















Already we can see all the supposed consequences of warming have not occurred. Assuming the 1.5C or so warming we've had since 1850, some scientists claim it should be cooling now but it's warming because of man made CO2. There is no experiment showing gas composition affects atmospheric temperatures, it is all from equations and models. The direct measurements made of similar gas changes show a very low possible increase, while in fact warming creates CO2 as the ocean releases more.

 Finally the fewer thick clouds in the air the more heat reaches the surface. The rise in temperature can be seen to follow the cloud cover (also called incoming solar radiation using the consequence rather than the cause), answering the question directly.


 









 And that is before the adjustments creating the alleged rises.



NASA 
changed their own satellite data not once but twice. This does not instil much confidence in the main source of temperature readings.






Deaths.

90% of temperature related deaths are from cold. Furthermore only the old and weak die from natural heat, everyone will die of cold equally.

I'll let the scientists have the last words.




https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanplh/article/PIIS2542-5196(23)00023-2/fulltext
https://www.gavi.org/vaccineswork/heat-waves-can-be-deadly-older-adults-aging-global-population-and-rising
https://climateataglance.com/climate-at-a-glance-temperature-related-deaths/
References:

Man made CO2 analysis. https://scienceofclimatechange.org/wp-content/uploads/SCC-Ato-2025.pdf?fbclid=IwY2xjawNzbW5leHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETBUZDFua3ptUk1EMktxbE5FAR6EK_vPpsJEK6Mf5rD7P_aIxD8iAjVNLWCGihiZCMIczIb4_rAb6kORTepttA_aem_pm8okpMJpLnRsMnIthmVXA

Spanish floods. Benito, Gerardo & Barriendos, M. & Llasat, Maria & Machado, Maria & Thorndycraft, V.. (2005). Impacts on natural hazards of climatic origin. A. Flood risk. Preliminary Evaluation of the Impacts of Climate Change in Spain. 507-527. 
Hot days. https://www.researchgate.net/figure/The-bar-graphs-show-the-number-of-days-with-daytime-maximum-temperature-at-or-above-95F_fig3_351707226
Reduction in fires. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-018-03838-0
https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rstb.2015.0345
https://climateataglance.com/climate-at-a-glance-u-s-wildfires/
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-025-09047-2
https://www.appstate.edu/~perrylb/Courses/Peru/5015/Readings/Sheffield_etal_2012.pdf
https://www.nature.com/articles/nature11575
Palmer drought security index. https://climatedataguide.ucar.edu/climate-data/palmer-drought-severity-index-pdsi
https://climateataglance.com/climate-at-a-glance-temperature-related-deaths/
Improved food production. https://www.cargill.com/story/in-4-charts-the-past-present-and-future-of-food-security
Hurricanes. https://climateataglance.com/climate-at-a-glance-hurricanes/
Adjustments. https://granthaminstitute.com/2015/10/16/taking-the-planets-temperature-how-are-global-temperatures-calculated/
Polar bears. https://climateataglance.com/climate-at-a-glance-polar-bears-and-climate/
Coral. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/56ba8d0e1d07c00ab0623bb8/t/65eac0f6f7c2fd3373086741/1709883660348/State+of+the+GBR+2024+final.pdf

https://www.aims.gov.au/monitoring-great-barrier-reef/gbr-condition-summary-2024-25
Cyclones. Ryan Maue https://climateataglance.com/climate-at-a-glance-global-tropical-cyclones/